Exploitation of Antibacterial Compound
Producing Marine Actinobacteria against Fish
Pathogens Isolated from Less Explored Environments
Thirumurugan D.1* and Vijayakumar
R.2
1Department of
Microbiology, S.R.M. Arts and Science College, Kattankulathur
– 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
2Department of
Microbiology, Bharathidasan University Constituent
College, Perambalur – 621 107, Tamil Nadu, India,
*Corresponding Author E-mail: microthiru08@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Totally, 82 actinobacteria
were isolated from the marine sediment samples of Bay of Bengal, east coast of Tamilnadu, India. Of 82 isolates, 21 (26%)
actinobacteria were possessed antibacterial activity
against fish pathogenic bacteria namely Vibrio
alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus,
V. cholera, Aeromonas sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Among 21 antagonistic isolates, the isolate ECR77 and ECR 64 showed
good inhibitory activity against test pathogens. The crude antibacterial
compounds from the potential antagonistic isolates were extracted using
different solvents after submerged fermentation. Of the various solvent
extracts tested, ethyl acetate
extract was showed good antibacterial activity against V. alginolyticus, V. cholera and Pseudomonas sp. The potential antibacterial compound producing isolates were
characterized by using standard methods of ISP (International Streptomyces Project) and tentatively identified as Streptomyces sp.
KEYWORDS: Marine sediments, east coast of India, actinobacteria,
fish pathogens, antibacterial activity.
INTRODUCTION:
Actinobacteria are most economically valuable prokaryotes which are well known
to produce chemically diverse metabolites with wide range of biological activity[1]. Actinobacteria
are unparalleled sources of bioactive metabolites including antibiotics,
enzymes, vitamins, plant growth promoters, and other substances[2].
Ocean has been considered as a rich source of compounds with novel structures
and biological activities. The marine environmental conditions are extremely
different from terrestrial ecosystem; hence marine actinobacteria
have different characteristics from those of terrestrial counterparts and
therefore might produce different types of bioactive compounds[3].
Unlike their terrestrial relatives, marine actinobacteria
have yet to be extensively investigated. Moreover, genetic adaptations to the
marine environment appear to include novel biosynthetic capabilities[4,5]
given the remarkable success in developing clinically useful drugs from
terrestrial actinobacteria.
Among actinobacteria, around 7600 compounds are produced by Streptomyces species they can produce around 80% of
the total antibiotics currently available in the market and other active
secondary metabolites[6-8].
Disease control and management in aquaculture has become one of the major
problems as the fish bacterial pathogens are becoming more and more resistant
to the conventional therapeutic drugs used in the industry and thus the fish
farmers suffer from heavy financial losses. Hence, there is an urgent need for
the search of novel bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential which can be
used to control the bacterial disease in an eco-friendly manner. So, the
present study deals with the isolation and characterization of marine actinobacteria isolated from east coast region of Tamilnadu as well as screening of the their antibacterial
activity against a fish pathogenic bacteria.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS:
Collection of soil samples:
Marine sediment
samples were collected from ten different locations of East Coast Regions (ECR)
of Tamilnadu, South India into sterile polythene
bags. Then the samples were dried/ pretreated in an oven at 40°C for seven to
ten days to reduce the numbers of vegetative bacterial cells[9]
and stored at 4°C for further use. The samples were serially diluted and spread
plate technique was implemented for the isolation of actinobacteria
on 50% sea water starch casein agar (SCA) and actinomycetes
isolation agar media with cyclohexamide 25mg/ml and nalidixic acid 20mg/ml[10] for the prevention of
other microbial contaminations. All the plates were incubated at 28şC for 7 to
15 days. After incubation, the actinobacterial
colonies were purified and sub-cultured on SCA medium.
Isolation of
bacterial pathogens:
The infected
prawns were collected from local market, transferred to laboratory and stored
at 4oC. The infected region (muscles) was separated and homogenized
using sterile mortar and pestle. One milliliter of the homogenized sample was
inoculated by using pour plate technique on nutrient agar and Thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar media
and incubated at 37şC for 24-48 h. After incubation, the bacterial colonies
were identified by using morphological, cultural and biochemical characters.
The identified bacterial cultures were maintained on nutrient agar slants at 4şC
for further use.
Screening of
antibacterial activity of actinobacteria
Primary
screening:
The
antibacterial activity of the actinobacteria was
primarily screened by cross streak plate method[11]
against Vibrio alginolyticus,
V. cholera, V. parahaemolyticus, Pseudomonas sp.
and Aeromonas sp. The actinobacterial
cultures were streaked at the corner of the Petri plates containing SCA and
incubated at 28şC for 5 days, and then 24 h old fish pathogen was inoculated
opposite to the original streak of actinobacteria
again the plates were incubated at 37şC for 24 h. Based on the presence of
inhibition zone, the isolates with antibacterial activity were selected for
further study.
Secondary
screening:
The isolates
with antibacterial activity in primarily screening were evaluated further for
their antibacterial efficacy by shake flask culture method[12]. The pure culture of actinobacteria
were inoculated in to starch casein broth and incubated in shaking condition
(120rpm) at 28şC for 5 days. The production medium was centrifuged in cooling
centrifuge (at 4şC) at 8000 rpm for 30 min. The crude antibacterial compound
was extracted from supernatant by sequential liquid-liquid extraction method
using organic solvents like acetone, chloroform, ethyl acetate, petroleum
ether and methanol. Then, the
antibacterial efficacy of the crude compound was tested against Vibrio sp., Aeromonas
sp. and Pseudomonas sp. by well diffusion method[13].
After incubation at 37şC for 24h, the diameters of the inhibition zones were
recorded.
Characterization
of actinobacteria:
Actinobacteria with potential antibacterial activity were identified based on
their morphological (aerial mass colour, reverse side
pigment, melanoid pigments and spore chain
morphology), physiological and biochemical characteristics by the standard
methods of International Streptomyces Project
(ISP)[14,15].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
A total of 311 actinobacterial colonies were isolated from 11 different
locations of east coast of India on SCA medium. Among 311 colonies, 82 were
morphologically different (Table 1).
Table 1. No. of colonies of actinomycetes in different station.
S. No |
Name of the sampling station |
No. of colonies (CFU/g) |
Station wise total colonies |
|
10-3 |
10-4 |
|
||
1 |
Marina Beach station |
05 |
07 |
03 |
2 |
Neelankarai |
10 |
06 |
05 |
3 |
Nedukuppam |
06 |
13 |
04 |
4 |
Muttukadu |
18 |
21 |
14 |
5 |
Mahapalipuram |
16 |
09 |
06 |
6 |
Poonjeri |
11 |
13 |
05 |
7 |
Kalapet |
08 |
09 |
06 |
8 |
Pitchavaram |
28 |
21 |
16 |
9 |
Annagkoil |
20 |
14 |
10 |
10 |
Samiyar pet |
23 |
19 |
06 |
11 |
Cuddalore |
21 |
12 |
07 |
Total colonies |
166 |
145 |
82 |
|
Overall total colonies |
311 |
The isolates
were produced small to medium sized, white, ash, green and brown coloured, circle shaped, powdery with regular margin
colonies with grey, black, red and golden yellow coloured
reverse side was formed (Table 2). Similarly, the previous reported that
different colour and size of actinobacteria
were isolated[16].
Table 2. Cultural characteristics
of antagonistic actinobacterial isolates.
S. No |
Isolate code |
Aerial mass colour |
Reverse side pigment |
Melanoid pigment |
1 |
ECR1 |
White |
- |
- |
2 |
ECR2 |
Light ash |
yellow |
- |
3 |
ECR4 |
Ash |
Black |
- |
4 |
ECR5 |
Whitish ash |
Yellow |
- |
5 |
ECR6 |
Ash |
Yellow |
- |
6 |
ECR10 |
White |
- |
- |
7 |
ECR11 |
White |
Yellow |
- |
8 |
ECR13 |
Greenish ash |
Brownish black |
- |
9 |
ECR16 |
Whitish gray |
- |
- |
10 |
ECR20 |
White |
- |
- |
11 |
ECR23 |
Grayish white |
Red |
Green |
12 |
ECR28 |
Ash |
Brown |
Green |
13 |
ECR31 |
Ash |
Red |
- |
14 |
ECR34 |
Ash |
- |
- |
15 |
ECR64 |
White |
- |
- |
16 |
ECR67 |
Ash |
- |
- |
17 |
ECR69 |
Ash |
- |
- |
18 |
ECR75 |
Ash |
Orange |
- |
19 |
ECR77 |
Gray |
Brown |
- |
20 |
ECR78 |
Greenish ash |
- |
- |
21 |
ECR81 |
Ash |
Orange |
- |
= No pigment
Table 3. Antibacterial activity
of actinobacteria against fish pathogens by cross
streak method.
S.No |
Name
of Actinobacteria |
Zone
of inhibition (mm) |
||||
V. cholarae |
V. parahaemolyticus |
V. alginolyticus |
Pseudomonas
sp. |
Aeromonas sp. |
||
1 |
ECR -
1 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
ECR -
2 |
- |
3 |
- |
6 |
- |
3 |
ECR -
4 |
6 |
- |
4 |
3 |
- |
4 |
ECR -
5 |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
5 |
ECR - 6 |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
3 |
6 |
ECR -
10 |
5 |
- |
3 |
3 |
- |
7 |
ECR -
11 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
ECR –
13 |
5 |
2 |
- |
4 |
- |
9 |
ECR –
16 |
- |
3 |
- |
4 |
- |
10 |
ECR -
20 |
4 |
6 |
- |
5 |
- |
11 |
ECR –
23 |
5 |
- |
4 |
6 |
3 |
12 |
ECR –
28 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
ECR –
31 |
- |
3 |
- |
6 |
- |
14 |
ECR –
34 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
15 |
ECR –
64 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
- |
16 |
ECR –
67 |
- |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
17 |
ECR –
69 |
4 |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
18 |
ECR –
75 |
- |
4 |
- |
7 |
- |
19 |
ECR –
77 |
9 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
- |
20 |
ECR –
78 |
4 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
21 |
ECR –
81 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
4 |
All the 82
isolates were tested for their antibacterial activity against fish pathogenic
bacteria namely Vibrio alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholera, Pseudomonas sp. and Aeromonas sp. by cross streak method. Out of 82 isolates, 21 (25.6%)
isolates had antibacterial activity against fish pathogenic bacteria
(Table 3).
Among the
21antibacterial isolates, 12 (57.14%) isolates had activity against both V. parahaemolyticus and Pseudomonas sp., 11
(52.38%) against V. cholera, 9 (42.85%) against V. alginolyticus and 3 (14.28%) against Aeromonas sp. in primary screening. Among 21
antibacterial compound producers, the isolates ECR77 and ECR64 showed good
inhibitory activity against all the bacterial pathogens tested except Aeromonas sp. in secondary screening. Hence, these two isolates were selected
for further studies. Correspondingly, the earlier study reported that, out of
68 actinobacteria from saltpan environment of Vedaranyam, India, 25 (36.8%) isolates produced
antimicrobial activity against various pathogens tested: 22 (88%) with
antibacterial activity, 16 (64%) with antifungal activity and 13 (52%) with
both antibacterial and antifungal activities[16]. Similarly, it
was reported that, among the 10 isolates
from marine sediment, the isolate ECR3 showed maximum activity against V. parahaemolyticus, V. harvei, V. alginolyticus, Pseudomonas sp. and Aeromonas hydrophilia[17].Thus,
the present and previous studies reported that, the antimicrobial
potentialities of the marine actinobacteria have not
been uniformly distributed. It has been greatly influenced by ecological,
biological and genetic properties of the isolates and culture media used for
the isolation and screening of antimicrobial activity. In the present study,
among the various solvents used for the extraction of the antibacterial
compounds, ethyl acetate extract of the isolate ECR77 and
ECR64 were expressed maximum activity in the
range of 4-16mm and 4-11mm respectively than petroleum ether extract against
fish pathogens, and acetone extract of the isolate ECR77 showed less activity
and no activity was found in acetone extract of the isolate ECR64 (Table 4).
Similarly, the
screening of the marine actinobacterial culture
extract was carried out by the disc method, which resulted in more than 10 to
30mm diameter inhibition zone against Aeromonas
hydrophila, V. harveyi,
V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus
and Serratia sp.[18].
Similar type of antimicrobial compound extraction studies from actinobacteria were reported by several workers[12,16].
Based on these studies it is clear that, solvent selection and extraction
processes are of the important step in the antimicrobial compound production. Both the two potent isolates were showed
excellent growth and formed abundant aerial mycelium on 50% sea water SCA
medium. The isolate ECR77 was produced un-branched aerial mycelium, grey
colored substrate mycelium with brown coloured
reverse pigment, and the aerial and substrate mycelia were medium dependent
with smooth and long chained spores, and ECR64 produced, white coloured aerial mycelium and does not produce reverse side
pigment. The isolate produced smooth and long chained spores (Table 5).
Both the
isolates did not produce any melanoid pigments. Based
on the morphological properties (colony and microscopic morphology), the
isolates ECR77 and ECR64 were tentatively identified as genus Streptomyces sp. ECR77 and Streptomyces sp. ECR64 (Table 5). The identification
of the potential isolates were compared with the keys of Nonomura
(1974)[19] and Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology[20].
Table 4. Antibacterial activity
of actinobacteria against Fish pathogen by well
diffusion method.
S. No |
ECR77
+ Solvent
|
Zone
of inhibition (mm) |
||||
V. cholarae |
V. parahaemolyticus |
V. alginolyticus |
Pseudomonas
sp. |
Aeromonas sp. |
||
1 |
Acetone |
06 |
- |
08 |
04 |
- |
2 |
Ethyl
acetate |
13 |
04 |
16 |
10 |
- |
3 |
Petroleum
ether |
07 |
- |
10 |
08 |
- |
|
ECR64+Solvent |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Acetone |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
Ethyl
acetate |
11mm |
04mm |
09mm |
11mm |
- |
6 |
Petroleum
ether |
04mm |
- |
06mm |
10mm |
- |
Table 5.
Morphological characterization of potential actinobacterial
isolates.
S. No |
Characteristics |
Results
|
|
ECR77 |
ECR64 |
||
Morphological
properties |
|||
1. |
Presence
of aerial and substrate mycelia |
+ |
+ |
2. |
Spores
in aerial mycelium |
+ |
+ |
3. |
Spores
in substrate mycelium |
- |
- |
4. |
No. of
spores on aerial mycelium |
21-50 |
20-50 |
5. |
Shape
of spores |
Globose |
Globose |
6. |
Spore
chain morphology |
Rectiflexibles |
Spirals |
7. |
Spore
surface |
smooth |
smooth |
8. |
Aerial
mycelium colour |
Grey |
white |
9. |
Reverse
side colour |
Brown |
- |
10. |
Melanin
pigment |
- |
- |
CONCLUSION:
The speciation
of the potential isolates and characterization of antibacterial compounds will
be the future course work. The results of the present investigation
reported that the marine actinobacteria from east
coast of India could be an alternative potent source of eco-friendly novel
antibiotics against fish pathogens instead of current drugs used in
aquaculture.
REFERENCES:
[1] Balagurunathan R. and Radhakrishnan
M. Actinomycetes: Diversity and their Importance. In Microbiolog-Applications and Current
Trends. P.C. Trivedi (ed.), Pointer publishers,
Jaipur, India. 2007; pp. 297-329.
[2] Keiser T, et
al. General Introduction to Actinomycete Biology
Practical Streptomyces Genetics. John Innes Foundation, Norwich, England. 2000; 1st
ed: pp. 1-18.
[3] Imada C, et al. Isolation and characterization of antibacterial substances produced by marine actinomycetes in the presence of seawater. Actinomycetologica. 21; 2007: 27-31.
[4] Feling RH, et al. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 355.
[5] Kwon HC, et al. Marinomycins a-d, antitumor antibiotics of a new structure
class from a marine actinomycete of the recently
discovered genus ‘Marinispora’. Journal of American Chemical Society. 128;
2006: 1622-1632.
[6] Jensen PR, et al.
Species-specific secondary metabolite
production in marine actinomycetes of the genus
Salinispora. Appllied and
Environmental Microbiology. 73(4); 2007: 1146-1152.
[7] Ramesh S, Rajesh M and Mathivanan
N. Characterization of a thermo stable alkaline protease produced by marine Streptomyces fungicides MML1614. Bioprocess Biosystematic Engineering. 32; 2009: 791-800.
[8] Thenmozhi M and Kannabiran K.
Anti-Aspergillus activity of Streptomyces spp. VITSTK7 isolated from Bay
of Bengal coast of Puducherry, India. Journal of Nature and Environmental Sciences. 2;
2011: 1-8.
[9] Williams ST, et
al. Studies on the ecology of the actinomycetes
in soil, VI: The influence of moisture tension on growth and survival. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 4; 1972:
215-225.
[10] Ravel J, et al.
Mercury-resistant actinomycetes from the Chesapeake
Bay. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 162;
1998: 177–184.
[11] Egorov NS. Antibiotics, a scientific
approach. Mir Publishers, Moscow. 1985.
[12] Remya M and Vijayakumar R.
Isolation and Characterization of marine antagonistic Actinomycetes
from west coast of india. Facta Universitatis
Series: Medicine and Biology. 15(1); 2008: 13-19.
[13] Dhanasekaran D, Panneerselvam A and Thajuddin N. An antifungal compound: 4' phenyl
-1-napthyl –phenyl acetamide from Streptomyces
sp. DPTB16. Facta Universitatis Series: Medicine Biology. 15(1); 2008: 7-12.
[14] Shirling EB and Gottileb D.
Methods for characterization of Streptomyces
species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 16; 1966: 313-340.
[15] Jensen PR, Dwight
R and Fenical W. Distribution of actinomycetes
in near shore tropical marine sediments. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology. 57; 1991: 1102–1108.
[16] Vijayakumar R, et al. Antimicrobial potentiality of a halophilic
strain of Streptomyces sp. VPTSA18 isolated
from the saltpan environment of Vedaranyam, India. Annals of Microbiology. 62(3); 2011: 1039-1047.
[17] Pugazhvendan SR, et al. Inhibition of fish bacterial
pathogen by marine actinomycetes. European
Journal of Appllied Sciences. 2(2); 2010:
41-43.
[18] Dharmaraj S. Antagonistic potential of marine actinobacteria against fish and shellfish pathogens. Turkey Journal of
Biology. 35; 2011: 303-311.
[19] Nonomura H. Key for classification and identification of
458 species of the Streptomyces included in
ISP. Journal of Fermentation Technology.
52; 1974: 78-92.
[20] Buchanan RE and
Gibbons NE. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative
Bacteriology, Williams and Wilkins Co., 1974; 8th ed: pp. 747-842.
Received on 30.01.2013 Accepted on 25.04.2013
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Res. 3(2): April- June
2013; Page 75-78