Exploitation of Antibacterial Compound Producing Marine Actinobacteria against Fish Pathogens Isolated from Less Explored Environments

 

Thirumurugan D.1* and Vijayakumar R.2

1Department of Microbiology, S.R.M. Arts and Science College, Kattankulathur – 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India

2Department of Microbiology, Bharathidasan University Constituent College, Perambalur – 621 107, Tamil Nadu, India,

*Corresponding Author E-mail: microthiru08@yahoo.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Totally, 82 actinobacteria were isolated from the marine sediment samples of Bay of Bengal, east coast of Tamilnadu, India. Of 82 isolates, 21 (26%) actinobacteria were possessed antibacterial activity against fish pathogenic bacteria namely Vibrio alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholera, Aeromonas sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Among 21 antagonistic isolates, the isolate ECR77 and ECR 64 showed good inhibitory activity against test pathogens. The crude antibacterial compounds from the potential antagonistic isolates were extracted using different solvents after submerged fermentation. Of the various solvent extracts tested, ethyl acetate extract was showed good antibacterial activity against V. alginolyticus, V. cholera and Pseudomonas sp. The potential antibacterial compound producing isolates were characterized by using standard methods of ISP (International Streptomyces Project) and tentatively identified as Streptomyces sp.

 

KEYWORDS: Marine sediments, east coast of India, actinobacteria, fish pathogens, antibacterial activity.

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Actinobacteria are most economically valuable prokaryotes which are well known to produce chemically diverse metabolites with wide range of biological activity[1]. Actinobacteria are unparalleled sources of bioactive metabolites including antibiotics, enzymes, vitamins, plant growth promoters, and other substances[2]. Ocean has been considered as a rich source of compounds with novel structures and biological activities. The marine environmental conditions are extremely different from terrestrial ecosystem; hence marine actinobacteria have different characteristics from those of terrestrial counterparts and therefore might produce different types of bioactive compounds[3]. Unlike their terrestrial relatives, marine actinobacteria have yet to be extensively investigated. Moreover, genetic adaptations to the marine environment appear to include novel biosynthetic capabilities[4,5] given the remarkable success in developing clinically useful drugs from terrestrial actinobacteria.

 

Among actinobacteria, around 7600 compounds are produced by Streptomyces species they can produce around 80% of the total antibiotics currently available in the market and other active secondary metabolites[6-8]. Disease control and management in aquaculture has become one of the major problems as the fish bacterial pathogens are becoming more and more resistant to the conventional therapeutic drugs used in the industry and thus the fish farmers suffer from heavy financial losses. Hence, there is an urgent need for the search of novel bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential which can be used to control the bacterial disease in an eco-friendly manner. So, the present study deals with the isolation and characterization of marine actinobacteria isolated from east coast region of Tamilnadu as well as screening of the their antibacterial activity against a fish pathogenic bacteria.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Collection of soil samples:

Marine sediment samples were collected from ten different locations of East Coast Regions (ECR) of Tamilnadu, South India into sterile polythene bags. Then the samples were dried/ pretreated in an oven at 40°C for seven to ten days to reduce the numbers of vegetative bacterial cells[9] and stored at 4°C for further use. The samples were serially diluted and spread plate technique was implemented for the isolation of actinobacteria on 50% sea water starch casein agar (SCA) and actinomycetes isolation agar media with cyclohexamide 25mg/ml and nalidixic acid 20mg/ml[10] for the prevention of other microbial contaminations. All the plates were incubated at 28şC for 7 to 15 days. After incubation, the actinobacterial colonies were purified and sub-cultured on SCA medium.

 

Isolation of bacterial pathogens:

The infected prawns were collected from local market, transferred to laboratory and stored at 4oC. The infected region (muscles) was separated and homogenized using sterile mortar and pestle. One milliliter of the homogenized sample was inoculated by using pour plate technique on nutrient agar and Thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar media and incubated at 37şC for 24-48 h. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were identified by using morphological, cultural and biochemical characters. The identified bacterial cultures were maintained on nutrient agar slants at 4şC for further use.

 

Screening of antibacterial activity of actinobacteria

Primary screening:                                                                                 

The antibacterial activity of the actinobacteria was primarily screened by cross streak plate method[11] against Vibrio alginolyticus, V. cholera, V. parahaemolyticus, Pseudomonas sp. and Aeromonas sp. The actinobacterial cultures were streaked at the corner of the Petri plates containing SCA and incubated at 28şC for 5 days, and then 24 h old fish pathogen was inoculated opposite to the original streak of actinobacteria again the plates were incubated at 37şC for 24 h. Based on the presence of inhibition zone, the isolates with antibacterial activity were selected for further study.

 

Secondary screening:

The isolates with antibacterial activity in primarily screening were evaluated further for their antibacterial efficacy by shake flask culture method[12]. The pure culture of actinobacteria were inoculated in to starch casein broth and incubated in shaking condition (120rpm) at 28şC for 5 days. The production medium was centrifuged in cooling centrifuge (at 4şC) at 8000 rpm for 30 min. The crude antibacterial compound was extracted from supernatant by sequential liquid-liquid extraction method using organic solvents like acetone, chloroform, ethyl acetate, petroleum ether and methanol. Then, the antibacterial efficacy of the crude compound was tested against Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp. and Pseudomonas sp. by well diffusion method[13]. After incubation at 37şC for 24h, the diameters of the inhibition zones were recorded.

 

Characterization of actinobacteria:

Actinobacteria with potential antibacterial activity were identified based on their morphological (aerial mass colour, reverse side pigment, melanoid pigments and spore chain morphology), physiological and biochemical characteristics by the standard methods of International Streptomyces Project (ISP)[14,15].

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

A total of 311 actinobacterial colonies were isolated from 11 different locations of east coast of India on SCA medium. Among 311 colonies, 82 were morphologically different (Table 1).

 

Table 1. No. of colonies of actinomycetes in different station.

S. No

Name of the sampling station

No. of colonies

(CFU/g)

Station wise total colonies

10-3

10-4

 

1

Marina Beach station

05

07

03

2

Neelankarai

10

06

05

3

Nedukuppam

06

13

04

4

Muttukadu

18

21

14

5

Mahapalipuram

16

09

06

6

Poonjeri

11

13

05

7

Kalapet

08

09

06

8

Pitchavaram

28

21

16

9

Annagkoil

20

14

10

10

Samiyar pet

23

19

06

11

Cuddalore

21

12

07

Total colonies

166

145

82

Overall total colonies

311

 

The isolates were produced small to medium sized, white, ash, green and brown coloured, circle shaped, powdery with regular margin colonies with grey, black, red and golden yellow coloured reverse side was formed (Table 2). Similarly, the previous reported that different colour and size of actinobacteria were isolated[16].

 

Table 2. Cultural characteristics of antagonistic actinobacterial isolates.

S. No

Isolate code

Aerial mass colour

Reverse side pigment

Melanoid pigment

1

ECR1

White

-

-

2

ECR2

Light ash

yellow

-

3

ECR4

Ash

Black

-

4

ECR5

Whitish ash

Yellow

-

5

ECR6

Ash

Yellow

-

6

ECR10

White

-

-

7

ECR11

White

Yellow

-

8

ECR13

Greenish ash

Brownish black

-

9

ECR16

Whitish gray

-

-

10

ECR20

White

-

-

11

ECR23

Grayish white

Red

Green

12

ECR28

Ash

Brown

Green

13

ECR31

Ash

Red

-

14

ECR34

Ash

-

-

15

ECR64

White

-

-

16

ECR67

Ash

-

-

17

ECR69

Ash

-

-

18

ECR75

Ash

Orange

-

19

ECR77

Gray

Brown

-

20

ECR78

Greenish ash

-

-

21

ECR81

Ash

Orange

-

= No pigment


Table 3. Antibacterial activity of actinobacteria against fish pathogens by cross streak method.

S.No

Name of Actinobacteria

Zone of inhibition (mm)

V. cholarae

V. parahaemolyticus

V. alginolyticus

Pseudomonas sp.

Aeromonas sp.

1

ECR - 1

-

3

-

-

-

2

ECR - 2

-

3

-

6

-

3

ECR - 4

6

-

4

3

-

4

ECR - 5

-

-

5

-

-

5

      ECR - 6

-

-

3

-

3

6

ECR - 10

5

-

3

3

-

7

ECR - 11

3

-

-

-

-

8

ECR – 13

5

2

-

4

-

9

ECR – 16

-

3

-

4

-

10

ECR - 20

4

6

-

5

-

11

ECR – 23

5

-

4

6

3

12

ECR – 28

4

-

-

-

-

13

ECR – 31

-

3

-

6

-

14

ECR – 34

-

3

-

-

-

15

ECR – 64

6

4

7

4

-

16

ECR – 67

-

3

3

-

-

17

ECR – 69

4

-

-

5

-

18

ECR – 75

-

4

-

7

-

19

ECR – 77

9

4

7

6

-

20

ECR – 78

4

-

3

-

-

21

ECR – 81

-

3

-

-

4


 

All the 82 isolates were tested for their antibacterial activity against fish pathogenic bacteria namely Vibrio alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholera, Pseudomonas sp. and Aeromonas sp. by cross streak method. Out of 82 isolates, 21 (25.6%) isolates had antibacterial activity against fish pathogenic bacteria  (Table 3).

 

Among the 21antibacterial isolates, 12 (57.14%) isolates had activity against both V. parahaemolyticus and Pseudomonas sp., 11 (52.38%) against V. cholera, 9 (42.85%) against V. alginolyticus and 3 (14.28%) against Aeromonas sp. in primary screening. Among 21 antibacterial compound producers, the isolates ECR77 and ECR64 showed good inhibitory activity against all the bacterial pathogens tested except Aeromonas sp. in secondary screening. Hence, these two isolates were selected for further studies. Correspondingly, the earlier study reported that, out of 68 actinobacteria from saltpan environment of Vedaranyam, India, 25 (36.8%) isolates produced antimicrobial activity against various pathogens tested: 22 (88%) with antibacterial activity, 16 (64%) with antifungal activity and 13 (52%) with both antibacterial and antifungal activities[16]. Similarly, it was  reported that, among the 10 isolates from marine sediment, the isolate ECR3 showed maximum activity against V. parahaemolyticus, V. harvei, V. alginolyticus, Pseudomonas sp. and Aeromonas hydrophilia[17].Thus, the present and previous studies reported that, the antimicrobial potentialities of the marine actinobacteria have not been uniformly distributed. It has been greatly influenced by ecological, biological and genetic properties of the isolates and culture media used for the isolation and screening of antimicrobial activity. In the present study, among the various solvents used for the extraction of the antibacterial compounds, ethyl acetate extract of the isolate ECR77 and

 

ECR64 were expressed maximum activity in the range of 4-16mm and 4-11mm respectively than petroleum ether extract against fish pathogens, and acetone extract of the isolate ECR77 showed less activity and no activity was found in acetone extract of the isolate ECR64 (Table 4).

 

Similarly, the screening of the marine actinobacterial culture extract was carried out by the disc method, which resulted in more than 10 to 30mm diameter inhibition zone against Aeromonas hydrophila, V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus and Serratia sp.[18]. Similar type of antimicrobial compound extraction studies from actinobacteria were reported by several workers[12,16]. Based on these studies it is clear that, solvent selection and extraction processes are of the important step in the antimicrobial compound production. Both the two potent isolates were showed excellent growth and formed abundant aerial mycelium on 50% sea water SCA medium. The isolate ECR77 was produced un-branched aerial mycelium, grey colored substrate mycelium with brown coloured reverse pigment, and the aerial and substrate mycelia were medium dependent with smooth and long chained spores, and ECR64 produced, white coloured aerial mycelium and does not produce reverse side pigment. The isolate produced smooth and long chained spores (Table 5).

 

Both the isolates did not produce any melanoid pigments. Based on the morphological properties (colony and microscopic morphology), the isolates ECR77 and ECR64 were tentatively identified as genus Streptomyces sp. ECR77 and Streptomyces sp. ECR64 (Table 5). The identification of the potential isolates were compared with the keys of Nonomura (1974)[19] and Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology[20].

 


 

Table 4. Antibacterial activity of actinobacteria against Fish pathogen by well diffusion method.

S. No

ECR77 +

Solvent

Zone of inhibition (mm)

V. cholarae

V. parahaemolyticus

V. alginolyticus

Pseudomonas sp.

Aeromonas sp.

1

Acetone

06

-

08

04

-

2

Ethyl acetate

13

04

16

10

-

3

Petroleum ether

07

-

10

08

-

 

ECR64+Solvent

 

 

 

 

 

4

Acetone

-

-

-

-

-

5

Ethyl acetate

11mm

04mm

09mm

11mm

-

6

Petroleum ether

04mm

-

06mm

10mm

-

 

 


Table 5. Morphological characterization of potential  actinobacterial isolates.

S. No

Characteristics

Results

ECR77

ECR64

Morphological properties

1.                                                                                         

 

Presence of aerial and substrate mycelia

+

+

2.                                                                                         

Spores in aerial mycelium

+

+

3.                                                                                         

Spores in substrate mycelium

-

-

4.                                                                                         

No. of spores on aerial mycelium

21-50

20-50

5.                                                                                         

Shape of spores

Globose

Globose

6.                                                                                         

Spore chain morphology

Rectiflexibles

Spirals

7.                                                                                         

Spore surface

smooth

smooth

8.                                                                                         

Aerial mycelium colour

Grey

white

9.                                                                                         

Reverse side colour

Brown

-

10.                                                                                       

Melanin pigment

-

-

 

CONCLUSION:

The speciation of the potential isolates and characterization of antibacterial compounds will be the future course work. The results of the present investigation reported that the marine actinobacteria from east coast of India could be an alternative potent source of eco-friendly novel antibiotics against fish pathogens instead of current drugs used in aquaculture.

 

REFERENCES:

[1]   Balagurunathan R. and Radhakrishnan M. Actinomycetes: Diversity and their Importance. In Microbiolog-Applications and Current Trends. P.C. Trivedi (ed.), Pointer publishers, Jaipur, India. 2007; pp. 297-329.

[2]   Keiser T, et al. General Introduction to Actinomycete Biology Practical Streptomyces Genetics. John Innes Foundation, Norwich, England. 2000; 1st ed: pp. 1-18.

[3]   Imada C, et al. Isolation and characterization of   antibacterial substances produced by marine actinomycetes in the presence of seawater. Actinomycetologica. 21; 2007: 27-31.

[4]   Feling RH, et al. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 355.

[5]   Kwon HC, et al. Marinomycins a-d, antitumor antibiotics of a new structure class from a marine actinomycete of the recently discovered genus Marinispora. Journal of American Chemical Society. 128; 2006: 1622-1632.

[6]   Jensen PR, et al. Species-specific secondary metabolite      production in marine actinomycetes of the genus Salinispora. Appllied and Environmental Microbiology. 73(4); 2007: 1146-1152.

[7]   Ramesh S, Rajesh M and Mathivanan N. Characterization of a thermo stable alkaline protease produced by marine Streptomyces fungicides MML1614. Bioprocess Biosystematic Engineering. 32; 2009: 791-800.

[8]   Thenmozhi M and Kannabiran K. Anti-Aspergillus activity of Streptomyces spp. VITSTK7 isolated from Bay of Bengal coast of Puducherry, India. Journal of Nature and Environmental Sciences. 2; 2011: 1-8.

[9]   Williams ST, et al. Studies on the ecology of the actinomycetes in soil, VI: The influence of moisture tension on growth and survival. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 4; 1972: 215-225.

[10] Ravel J, et al. Mercury-resistant actinomycetes from the Chesapeake Bay. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 162; 1998: 177–184.

[11] Egorov NS. Antibiotics, a scientific approach. Mir Publishers, Moscow. 1985.

[12] Remya M and Vijayakumar R. Isolation and Characterization of marine antagonistic Actinomycetes from west coast of india. Facta Universitatis Series: Medicine and Biology. 15(1); 2008: 13-19.

[13] Dhanasekaran D, Panneerselvam A and Thajuddin N. An antifungal compound: 4' phenyl -1-napthyl –phenyl acetamide from Streptomyces sp. DPTB16. Facta Universitatis Series: Medicine Biology. 15(1); 2008: 7-12.

[14] Shirling EB and Gottileb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology.  16; 1966: 313-340.

[15] Jensen PR, Dwight R and Fenical W. Distribution of actinomycetes in near shore tropical marine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 57; 1991: 1102–1108.

[16] Vijayakumar R­, et al. Antimicrobial potentiality of a halophilic strain of Streptomyces sp. VPTSA18 isolated from the saltpan environment of Vedaranyam, India. Annals of Microbiology. 62(3); 2011: 1039-1047.

[17] Pugazhvendan SR, et al. Inhibition of fish bacterial pathogen by marine actinomycetes. European Journal of Appllied Sciences. 2(2); 2010: 41-43.

[18] Dharmaraj S. Antagonistic potential of marine actinobacteria against fish and shellfish pathogens. Turkey Journal of Biology. 35; 2011: 303-311.

[19] Nonomura H. Key for classification and identification of 458 species of the Streptomyces included in ISP. Journal of Fermentation Technology. 52; 1974: 78-92.

[20] Buchanan RE and Gibbons NE. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Williams and Wilkins Co., 1974; 8th ed:  pp. 747-842.

 

 

Received on 30.01.2013          Accepted on 25.04.2013        

© Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

Asian J. Pharm. Res. 3(2): April- June 2013; Page 75-78